Fiscal Implications of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

MODERNIST’S ASSET CLASS INVESTING PORTFOLIOS ARE STRATEGICALLY INVESTED WITH A FOCUS ON LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES. PORTFOLIO ALLOCATIONS AND INVESTMENTS ARE NOT ADJUSTED IN RESPONSE TO MARKET NEWS OR ECONOMIC EVENTS; HOWEVER, OUR INVESTMENT COMMITTEE EVALUATES AND REPORTS ON MARKET AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS TO PROVIDE OUR INVESTORS WITH PERSPECTIVE AND TO PUT PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE IN PROPER CONTEXT.

 

On July 4, 2025, Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) aka the Big Brutal Tax Act, one of the most significant fiscal measures in recent years. The law extends many provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which were set to expire at year-end.

Watch Georgia’s video to understand staggering social impact of the bill and the actions we can take to resist.

We also expect to see lower government revenue and higher projected deficits. For investors, a new question becomes what rising debt might mean for the economy and financial markets.

bigger deficits ahead

The Bipartisan Policy Center estimates that OBBBA will add about $3.4 trillion to deficits over the next decade. That figure reflects three changes:

  • Reduced tax revenue: Roughly $4.5 trillion less, due to extending tax cuts and adding new ones.

  • Increased spending: About $325 billion more, largely for defense and immigration.

  • Reduced spending elsewhere: Roughly $1.4 trillion less, mostly through changes to Medicaid, food assistance, and student loans.

When interest payments on this additional debt are included, the projected cost rises to over $4.1 trillion. If temporary provisions are later made permanent, the total could reach $5 trillion.

Debt Projections

Even before OBBBA, U.S. debt was on the rise. In January, the Congressional Budget Office projected that debt held by the public would grow from $29 trillion (98% of GDP) to $52 trillion (118% of GDP) by 2035. Updated forecasts that account for OBBBA now expect debt closer to $53 trillion (120% of GDP) by then.

For perspective, the highest debt level in U.S. history was 106% of GDP during World War II. Current trends suggest the U.S. will exceed that record within the next decade. Some scenarios point to debt reaching 134% of GDP by 2035, depending on tax policy, tariffs, and interest rates.

Why Investors Should Care

Rising government debt can create challenges:

Higher borrowing costs if investors demand greater returns on U.S. bonds.

Potential future tax increases to help reduce deficits.

Less flexibility for the government to respond to economic downturns.

Reduced investment in long-term priorities like infrastructure or education.

That said, debt does not automatically spell trouble for markets. Other developed nations, such as Japan, have operated with much higher debt-to-GDP ratios for decades without experiencing financial collapse. And research shows there isn’t a clear link between high government debt and weaker stock market returns.

Staying Grounded

The passage of OBBBA will shape fiscal policy for years, but its long-term impact on markets remains uncertain. For investors, the key takeaway is not to react to alarming headlines about deficits or debt levels. Markets tend to adapt to fiscal changes over time, and disciplined strategies usually outperform short-term reactions.

The most effective way to manage this uncertainty is through broad diversification, a long-term perspective, and a financial plan tailored to your goals. Working with an advisor ensures your portfolio remains resilient—regardless of how the debt story unfolds in Washington.

 

For informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. Certain information is based upon third-party sources, which may become outdated or otherwise superseded without notice. Third-party information is deemed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Indices are not available for direct investment. Their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio nor do indices represent results of actual trading. Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Mentions of securities are to demonstrate passive funds versus active funds, and low-cost funds. The mentions of specific securities should not be construed as recommendations of securities. Performance is historical and past performance is not an indication of future results. By clicking on any of the links above, you acknowledge that they are solely for your convenience, and do not necessarily imply any affiliations, sponsorships, endorsements, or representations whatsoever by us regarding third-party websites. We are not responsible for the content, availability, or privacy policies of these sites, and shall not be responsible or liable for any information, opinions, advice, products or services available on or through them. The opinions expressed by featured authors are their own and may not accurately reflect those of Buckingham Strategic Wealth® or Buckingham Strategic Partners®, collectively Buckingham Wealth Partners. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) nor any other federal or state agency have approved, determined the accuracy, or confirmed the adequacy of this article. R-24-6678


Previous
Previous

2025 Tax Planning: Impact in Dollars & Values

Next
Next

Q3 Market Commentary: A Look Back & Ahead